Examined the first three lessons of this unit.
The first lesson starts
by asking, “How can we slow down the fall of a binder clip?”
“This lesson prepares
the children to understand the idea of air resistance, which they will learn
about in session two… The children also learn that scientists investigate by
making observations and performing tests.”
While many scientists do investigate by making observations
and performing tests, that isn’t the only way things are done and to say so
limits student thinking. Some scientists
don’t perform tests or experiments other than the ones in their own mind. I would also be hesitant to use the question
cards that use the words “air resistance” before we’ve discussed what that
is. It’s educationally inappropriate to
use vocabulary that students may not understand and to wait until a later
lesson to explain terminology. I would
give either give a brief description of what “air resistance” is or to perform
the experiment and then talk about the vocabulary.
Later in the lesson, gravity is mentioned in passing. It is also stated that gravity isn’t the
focus of the lesson. Then why mention
gravity at all? To avoid that confusion,
I think it would be better to avoid the topic of gravity all together and not
ask why objects fall to the ground unless gravity has already been discussed in
a previous lesson.
The end of session one focused on working together and
exploring instead of actually having answers, a great example in looking at the
nature of science instead of simple processes.
Session two focused on air resistance and parachutes. Instead of demonstrating the making of a
parachute for students, I think it would be better to show a video of
parachutes in action and then ask students to make their own parachutes with
the materials provided. It would show
more constructivist thinking to get the students to build and create with their
own ideas with the teacher as a guide.
Session three did a good job of including video clips and
focusing on the social nature of science again.
However, instead of making a rocket for them and explaining why to make
rockets a certain way to improve performance it would be better to give
students the materials and allow them to make their own rockets and then go
through the process of revising them.
Revising work and making changes is a part of the nature of science and
an integral part of actually being a scientist.
You can buy the Kidz Science kits HERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment